Posted by Nelson Simpkins on July 11, 1999 at 19:26:53:
On parts e and f are we supposed to strictly adhere to Definition 3.2 for Omega or can we bend the rules somewhat like in Example 3.8 pg. 55.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
Subject:
Comments: : On parts e and f are we supposed to strictly adhere to Definition 3.2 for Omega or can we bend the rules somewhat like in Example 3.8 pg. 55.
Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: